I was well aware the dick is Photoshopped. It's pretty damn obvious. I always find it curious and odd that someone always has to write note to point it out.
"pretty damn obvious" -- I am quite ready to believe that the photo has been doctored, but where, exactly, are the discontinuities or duplicated pixels that make it obvious that the picture has been photoshopped? What is the tip off? (To me it just looks a bit too long -- not that it could not be that long, it's just not very common.)
Is it a problem that the photo is doctored? (There was a discussion in one of the New York Times blogs about a proposed law in France that would require any 'enhanced,' airbrushed, or photoshopped picture to be so labeled.)
Special Content does not claim credit for any images shown unless otherwise noted. The rights or copyrights to images belong to the respective owner(s). If you own rights to an image and do not wish it to appear here, you may contact this blog.
Contents of this blog are the viewpoints and choices of the blogger, and are not in any way related to the blogger's employer or its clients. Comments posted on this blog are not necessarily the opinion or viewpoint of the blogger. . . . . . .
7 comments:
Perfection !!!!!!!!!
Was thrilled to see the pic in "The Slab" blog, so you can imagine how much more I was to see the meat in this one.
...drooling...
Photoshopped. There are lots of pics of him out there that show it as it really is - impressive without being ridiculous.
I was well aware the dick is Photoshopped. It's pretty damn obvious. I always find it curious and odd that someone always has to write note to point it out.
I always find it curious that someone has to Photoshop a guy's dick, particularly when he already has a perfectly delicious one to start with.
"pretty damn obvious" -- I am quite ready to believe that the photo has been doctored, but where, exactly, are the discontinuities or duplicated pixels that make it obvious that the picture has been photoshopped? What is the tip off? (To me it just looks a bit too long -- not that it could not be that long, it's just not very common.)
Is it a problem that the photo is doctored? (There was a discussion in one of the New York Times blogs about a proposed law in France that would require any 'enhanced,' airbrushed, or photoshopped picture to be so labeled.)
Post a Comment
All comments are screened and moderated.